Transforma tu Vida con Lipedema

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disorder of subcutaneous adipose tissue that mainly affects women. It is characterized by disproportionate fat hypertrophy, pain, bruising, and marked resistance to diet and exercise. Tumescent liposuction remains the only effective treatment to slow or reverse disease progression, but involves large volumes and fragile microvasculature, increasing bleeding risk.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether perioperative tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bruising, and early complications in lipedema liposuction.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 230 staged liposuction procedures for lipedema performed between 2021 and 2024 at a single center. Patients received TXA intravenously, locally, or in combination, or no TXA. Primary outcomes were estimated intraoperative blood loss and postoperative ecchymosis. Secondary endpoints included hematoma, transfusion need, thromboembolic events, infections, and recovery time.

RESULTS: All TXA groups showed significantly lower intraoperative blood loss and hemoglobin drop versus controls (p < 0.01). Local and combined routes were most effective, with the combined approach yielding the lowest ecchymosis scores. Hematoma rates dropped from 12% (no TXA) to 0-6.7% (TXA), and no thromboembolic or infectious complications were observed. No TXA-treated patients required transfusions, while 6% of controls did.

CONCLUSIONS: TXA use in lipedema liposuction significantly reduces bleeding and bruising without increasing thromboembolic risk. Combined systemic and local administration appears most beneficial. These findings support TXA as a safe, effective adjunct in multistage, high-volume liposuction for lipedema. Prospective trials are needed to confirm the optimal protocol in this unique population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is an abnormal accumulation of subcutaneous fat that usually affects the lower extremities. Inflammation due to adipose tissue may negatively affect body structure and functions.

OBJECTIVE: This case-control study aimed to assess lower extremity muscle strength, endurance and function, functional exercise capacity, pressure pain threshold, and edema in women with lipedema and compare with healthy women.

METHODS: Women with lipedema and healthy women of similar age and body mass index (BMI) were included in the study. Lower extremity muscle strength, muscle endurance, functionality, functional exercise capacity, pressure pain threshold, and edema (local tissue water) were assessed with digital dynamometer, 30-Second Sit to Stand Test (30-SSTS), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT), manual algometer and skin moisture meter, respectively.

RESULTS: Twenty-four women with lipedema (mean age: 47.9 ± 1.8 years, median BMI: 30.62 (19.03-41.20) kg/m) and 20 healthy women (mean age: 47.2 ± 12.1 years, median BMI: 28.12 (23.23-39.66) kg/m) participated in the study. Muscle strength for all assessing lower extremity muscles, 30-SSTS repetition number, LEFS score, pressure pain threshold of all assessing regions, percent of predicted 6MWT distance ( < .001) and 6MWT distance ( = .001) were significantly lower in women with lipedema compared to healthy controls. No significant difference was in terms of local tissue water percentage ( > .050).

CONCLUSION: Lower extremity muscle strength, muscle endurance, functionality, functional exercise capacity and pressure pain threshold decrease in women with lipedema. It is recommended that these changes be taken into account when developing rehabilitation strategies.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic female disease characterized by a painful accumulation of adipose tissue in the limbs. Plasma fatty acid (FA) composition has been proposed as a potential modulator of pain. However, the pathophysiology behind lipedema pain remains uncertain. The primary objective of this secondary analysis was to compare changes in plasma concentrations of FAs between low-energy diets either low in carbohydrates or low in fat, in females with lipedema and obesity. A secondary objective was to investigate potential associations between changes in pain and changes in the concentration of several FAs.

METHODS: Females with lipedema and obesity (BMI 30–45 kg/m) were randomized to isocaloric low-energy diets, either low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) or low-fat diet for 8 weeks. Plasma concentrations of FAs were quantified using gas chromatography and subjective pain using the Brief Pain Inventory, before and after the intervention.

RESULTS: 70 females were included in the analyses, with a mean BMI of 37 ± 5 kg/m and mean age of 47 ± 11 years. Significant decreases in the concentration of the saturated FAs (SFAs) myristic, stearic, and behenic acids, and the polyunsaturated FAs (PUFA) gamma-linolenic (GLA), dihomo-gamma-linolenic (DGLA), alpha-linolenic (ALA), eicosapentaenoic (EPA), and docosapentaenoic acids (DPA) were seen in both groups. A reduction in the SFA arachidic acid, and the monounsaturated FAs (MUFA) palmitoleic and oleic acids was seen in the LCD group only, while an increase in the SFA lignoceric acid and a decrease in the PUFA linoleic acid was seen only the low-fat diet group. Changes in myristic and palmitic acids (SFAs) were positively associated with changes in pain.

CONCLUSION: A reduction in most FAs was found after energy restricted LCD and low-fat diets in females with lipedema and obesity. Notably, reductions in SFAs seem to be associated with the reduction in pain seen in the LCD group, especially myristic acid. These findings suggest that FA composition may play a role in pain reduction in females with lipedema.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04632810, Effect of Ketosis on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Lipedema (Lipodiet).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12937-026-01304-y.

Lipedema is a chronic, progressive adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate subcutaneous fat accumulation, pain, edema, and resistance to conventional weight-loss strategies. Although traditionally conceptualized as a disease of adipose expansion, increasing clinical and imaging evidence suggests that functional impairment in advanced lipedema cannot be explained by adipose pathology alone. This narrative, hypothesis-generating review proposes an integrated pathophysiological framework in which inflammatory myosteatosis serves as a mechanistic bridge between lipedema progression and dynapenia. We examine how chronic adipose inflammation, microvascular dysfunction, and impaired lipid mobilization may promote ectopic lipid deposition within skeletal muscle, leading to mitochondrial inflexibility, oxidative stress, and reduced contractile efficiency. Within this model, lipedematous dynapenic myosteatosis may explain the paradox of reduced muscle strength despite preserved or increased limb volume, particularly during the transition from Stage 2.5 to Stage 3. Unlike obesity-associated dynapenia, which is primarily driven by systemic metabolic overload, lipedema-related muscle dysfunction may involve localized adipose-muscle inflammatory crosstalk and mechanical intolerance to exercise. This framework reframes advanced lipedema as a disorder of coupled adipose-muscle dysfunction rather than isolated adipose excess. The model is conceptual and intended to generate testable hypotheses, highlighting the need for future studies incorporating objective measures of muscle quality, mitochondrial function, and inflammatory signaling to clarify mechanisms underlying functional decline.

Lipedema is a lipodystrophic disease characterized primarily by a disproportionate increase in lower body subcutaneous fat. Although moderate weight loss decreases lower body fat mass in women with obesity and lipedema, it is possible that this decrease is due to a reduction in normal subcutaneous fat, rather than lipedema-affected fat. We evaluated the effect of moderate (11%) diet-induced weight loss on body fat mass and distribution, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging, in a 56-year-old woman with lipedema who was normal weight (body mass index: 23.9 kg/m) at baseline. Approximately 85% of the decrease in body weight comprised body fat. The relative reduction in upper body fat (abdominal subcutaneous, arm and trunk fat) was similar to the relative reduction in lower body (total leg fat and thigh subcutaneous fat). Accordingly, weight loss did not change the proportion of total body fat comprising leg fat (44.8% and 45.1% before and after weight loss, respectively) or arm fat (9.1% and 9.6% before and after weight loss, respectively). These data suggest weight loss decreases lipedema-affected adipose tissue and demonstrate the therapeutic effect of weight loss on body composition in women with lipedema even if they are normal weight.

Lipedema is a chronic disease characterized by the symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue in the lower body, primarily affecting women. Despite being recognized for over 85 years, the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of lipedema remain complex and not fully understood. This review consolidates current knowledge, emphasizing histological, genetic, and hormonal factors, alongside diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Histological studies highlight changes such as adipocyte hypertrophy, increased fibrosis, and vascular alterations like angiogenesis. Genetic studies suggest a strong familial component, with multiple loci potentially influencing disease onset, yet the condition remains polygenic and influenced by environmental factors. Hormonal influences, particularly estrogen, play a significant role in disease pathogenesis. Diagnostic imaging techniques like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide valuable insights but are not definitive. Therapeutic strategies, including diet, weight loss, and Complex Decongestive Therapy, offer symptom management but are not curative, with liposuction considered for severe cases where conservative methods fail. The condition's complexity stems from genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences, necessitating further research to improve diagnostic and treatment strategies. Integrating genetic and hormonal insights into clinical practice could enhance patient outcomes and quality of life, highlighting the need for continued exploration and understanding of lipedema.

Lipedema is a chronic, underdiagnosed adipose disorder marked by disproportionate fat accumulation, pain, and impaired mobility. Misdiagnosis as obesity or lymphedema delays care and increases morbidity. We systematically reviewed clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and management options (conservative and surgical). A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted in January 2025 for English-language articles published from January 1950 to January 2023 using the keywords "lipedema" or "lipoedema." Additional references were identified via manual review of relevant systematic reviews. Two independent reviewers screened studies and graded quality using a modified Oxford scale. Of 339 articles, 61 met the inclusion criteria. Most were observational cohorts, case series, or expert consensus, with few randomized trials. Conservative therapies, including ketogenic or Rare Adipose Disorders (RAD) diets, compression therapy, and aquatic exercise, were associated with reduced pain and swelling (Grade 2A-2B). Tumescent liposuction showed the strongest evidence for sustained symptom improvement, mobility, and quality of life (Grade 1 recommendation, evidence quality 2-3). Lipedema is a distinct, progressive condition requiring early recognition and intervention. Conservative therapies may provide partial relief, but tumescent liposuction remains the most effective treatment. Standardized diagnostic criteria, validated patient-reported outcomes, and clearer guidelines are needed to harmonize care and improve long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a progressive subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder predominantly affecting women. Characterized by painful nodules and inflammation, it impairs mobility and quality of life. Traditional nonsurgical treatments currently offer limited relief and necessitate additional interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SMiLE (Softening, Mobilization, Liposuction, Extraction), a lipedema reduction surgery (LRS) technique. This technique combines lymphatic-sparing liposuction with manual lipedema extraction to comprehensively remove lipedema nodules.

METHODS: Sixty-two women who underwent LRS with the SMiLE technique by the primary author participated in the study and completed an online survey. Data were collected on prior medical history related to lipedema development and comorbidities and outcome measures such as pain, activities of daily living, and quality of life before and after surgery.

RESULTS: The findings demonstrate significant improvements in patients' daily lives following surgery. Pain levels decreased by an average of 73.9%, with the most notable reduction in the buttock shelf (81.3%). Mobility improved for 93% of participants who had faced challenges before LRS, and quality-of-life assessments indicated a 47.5% reduction in the negative impact of lipedema postsurgery.

CONCLUSIONS: The SMiLE technique offers an advancement in the surgical management of lipedema by enabling the effective removal of lipedema tissue. Alongside a reduction in pain and improvement in mobility, this method addresses physical and psychological burdens. This study suggested that the SMiLE technique could be considered an option as part of a comprehensive approach to treating patients with lipedema.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative fibrosis is a frequent complication following liposuction for lipedema. Serrapeptase, a proteolytic enzyme with purported anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects, is used empirically, but robust evidence supporting its efficacy is lacking. This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of postoperative serrapeptase supplementation in reducing fibrosis following lower limb liposuction for lipedema.

METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study included 50 female patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lipedema undergoing tumescent liposuction. Patients were allocated to either a serrapeptase group (n = 25), receiving 60,000 IU daily for 4 weeks, or a control group (n = 25) receiving standard care alone. The primary outcome was tissue stiffness measured by quantitative ultrasound elastography (QUS). Secondary outcomes included B-mode ultrasonography, patient-reported pain (VAS), and clinical assessment of induration. Evaluations were performed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 3 months.

RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in the primary outcome of tissue stiffness at 4 weeks (14.8 ± 3.1 kPa vs. 15.2 ± 3.0 kPa; p = 0.62) or 3 months (13.7 ± 2.9 kPa vs. 14.0 ± 3.2 kPa; p = 0.78). Similarly, no significant benefits were seen in secondary outcomes, including fibrotic changes on ultrasound, VAS pain scores, or clinical induration (p > 0.05 for all). Serrapeptase was well-tolerated with no adverse events reported.

CONCLUSIONS: Oral serrapeptase supplementation did not demonstrate measurable efficacy in preventing postoperative fibrosis or improving patient-reported outcomes following liposuction for lipedema. These findings do not support its routine use in this clinical setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Background Lipedema is characterized by disproportionate gluteofemoral adiposity with anti-inflammatory properties. We hypothesized that this phenotype may confer immunological protection against T-helper 1 (Th1)-mediated autoimmunity ("Immunological Shield Hypothesis"). Objective The objective of this study is to explore whether women with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-defined lipedema-like phenotype, characterized by disproportionate gluteofemoral fat accumulation, exhibit distinct immunometabolic profiles and lower prevalence of celiac disease (CD) autoimmunity in a nationally representative sample. Methods The cross-sectional analysis included 3,833 women from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2014. Celiac disease (n=11, 0.56% weighted prevalence) was defined by strict serology (tissue transglutaminase {tTG}-IgA+/endomysial antibody {EMA}-IgA+); lipedema phenotype was defined as leg-to-trunk fat ratio of >90th percentile via DXA. Results Women with celiac disease exhibited 7.4% lower gynoid fat (39.5% versus 42.6%, p=0.0007), persisting in overweight/obese strata. Conversely, the lipedema phenotype demonstrated superior metabolic health: 44.2% lower homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (p<0.001) and 7.6% lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p=0.012). Conclusions This exploratory population-based analysis identifies phenotypic divergence in fat distribution between the DXA-defined lipedema phenotype and celiac disease autoimmunity, yielding observations consistent with, but not confirmatory of, the "Immunological Shield Hypothesis." While limited by the small number of celiac cases (n=11), a sample size insufficient to detect prevalence differences for a ~7%-9% phenotype, for which approximately 225-600 celiac cases would be required, the observed differences in gynoid adiposity (7.4% reduction, p=0.0007) and the favorable metabolic profile of the lipedema phenotype (44.2% lower HOMA-IR and 7.6% lower NLR) suggest biological plausibility warranting validation in larger, targeted cohorts. These findings motivate targeted studies to evaluate whether dietary exposures, including gluten-related immune activation, interact with gluteofemoral adipose biology in lipedema.